Videogames vs. the World: eXistenZ

You enter the Chinese restaurant. You sit at a table with Alexa and several co-workers. A Waiter approaches.

> Order Special

The Waiter says the Special is only served on special occasions.

> Lie to Waiter

You tell the Waiter that it’s Alexa’s birthday. He tells you that is indeed a special occasion. The other people at your table leave.

> Pause game

Welcome to Unwinnable’s new column on videogames in other media. We game lovers are used to games being treated poorly on television, in books or at the movies. So when one of those gets our medium right, that’s special, worthy of praise and also worthy of examination. What do these other pieces of media get right about games, how does that make them more interesting and what do these other pieces of media say about videogames?

David Cronenberg’s 1999 film eXistenZ is my favorite videogame movie. It was released less than a month after The Matrix, which overwhelmed and rendered it largely forgotten. Not that it ever had a chance to have the other film’s massive success; eXistenZ is a deeply weird, occasionally disturbing, half-stupid, half-genius film that seems to promise action while never delivering. It’s also filled with Cronenberg’s signature body horror, with several instances of surgery, penetration and infection. Those aspects keep it interesting enough, but what I find most compelling about it is that it is a film about videogames that’s built on game mechanics, instead of the more typical videogame references. The former examines how games are played via film; the latter uses tropes which are associated with videogames (Scott Pilgrim may be the pinnacle of the latter, and I’ll be talking about it in this space soon enough).

> Resume game

The Waiter brings you and Alexa the Special. It is a cooked version of the mutated amphibian you saw before. It smells disgusting, but you are hungry.

> Eat Special

You grab a limb of the Special and eat it. You are left with an Odd Long Bone. You are still hungry.

> Eat Special

You eat more of the Special. You now have an Odd Squat Bone.

> Combine Bones

They fit together!

The key to understanding eXistenZ is that the film is built on game logic, using game tropes. There’s an artificial awkwardness to the proceedings from the very beginning, but that is familiar if you’ve played high-dialogue games, particularly adventures and role-playing games. There are pauses between when characters speak. Sometimes their dialogue is smooth, sometimes it’s cliché statements that exist only to move the plot along. The conflict gets kicked off in the first scene, when rock star videogame designer Allegra Geller is shot and wounded while showing her new game, eXistenZ, to a focus group. In the chaos, a low-level marketing flunky named Ted Pikul is asked to take her to safety by the PR official in charge of the event. Wounded, possibly dying, he grabs Pikul and tells him: “We have enemies in our own house. Trust no one. Trust no one!” in head-slappingly on-the-nose fashion.

> Eat Special

You eat more chunks of the Special. You get more Oddly-Shaped Bones

> Combine Bones

They fit together! They are shaped like an Odd Gun.

Yet the fun of eXistenZ is that it doesn’t bother to explain that it’s using this logic for the bulk of the film. Many of the crucial scenes take place once Pikul and Geller are able to play the eXistenZ game together. The film takes place in an unspecified future, where game input involves direct neurological stimulation, making the games a form of virtual reality. It looks just like “reality,” so the actors are the same. But the logic and actions are different. An apparent non-player character with a bizarre accent exists only to give them directions. Allegra Geller, being the game expert, walks Pikul through the sequence. She analyzes the NPC, calling out his accent and how poorly-written and developed he is. But more specifically, she explains that when he doesn’t react to what Pikul says, simply going into a behavior loop and repeating what he said, it’s the game waiting for Pikul to say the right thing.

And we’ve all played that in games. It’s especially prevalent in Japanese RPGs – Suikoden in particular was famous for having dozens of dialogue options where the NPCs/game logic simply wouldn’t accept the “wrong” answer despite giving you the choice. But it was hardly the only game like that. Allegra explaining the game logic to Ted is amusing on its face, instrumental for understanding the film and especially pointed for a game character. Ted shouting at the NPC then wondering why he’s shouting is a scene straight out of when Mass Effect has Shepard say things the player didn’t intend. Then, when Pikul and Geller start to make out awkwardly, she describes it, gasping between kisses, as a “pathetically mechanical attempt to heighten the emotion for the next game sequence,” which is essentially the purpose of romance in most games, especially (again) Mass Effect, Dragon Age and games built on the BioWare model. The game of eXistenZ is apparently built on choice, but only within a constrained set of parameters which push players down that path.


Your mouth hurts.

> Examine mouth

You poke in your mouth and discover a loose bridge of Teeth. You pull them and they come out.

> Combine Teeth with Odd Gun

The Teeth fit! You now have a Tooth-Shooting Gun.

eXistenZ isn’t just descriptive of games, it’s also aspirational. Early in the film, a  fan describes one of Allegra Geller’s games in glowing terms: “Have you ever played her game heArtGod?…” Thou, the player of the game, art god.’ Very spiritual. Funny, too. God, the artist. The mechanic. Funny!” A game that instills that kind of emotional reaction is essentially Peter Molyneaux’s wet dream.

> Use Tooth-Shooting Gun on Alexa

You point the gun at Alexa. She doesn’t think that’s funny.

The film also shows the limits – or benefits – or approaching realism in game design. A panicking Ted Pikul, in eXistenZ, questions Geller about the whole point:

“I don’t like it here. We’re both stumbling around together in this unformed world whose rules and objectives are largely unknown, seemingly indecipherable or even possibly nonexistent! Always on the verge of being killed by forces that we don’t understand.”

“That sounds like my game, all right.”

“That sounds like a game that’s not gonna be easy to market.”

“But it’s a game everybody’s already playing.”

To hammer home the point, Geller raises her arms, adopting the pose of Christ on the crucifix (it’s for an impending metal detection test, but that isn’t immediately apparent). The designer is God, God is the designer, and we’re all just playing games of various complexity, whether we know it or not.

The Waiter approaches.

> Use Tooth-Shooting Gun on Waiter

You shoot the Waiter with two teeth. He dies.

Subscribe to Unwinnable Weekly
Categories:
Commentary, Gaming, Movies, Rowan Kaiser, Science Fiction, Videogames vs. the World
Unwinnable On The Web:
  • Chuck

    The last time I saw Jennifer Jason Leigh was in this movie.

  • http://infinitelag.blogspot.com John Peter Grant

    I love this film too. There are a lot of oddities about it, but the thing that surprises me most is how prescient it is. The multiple layers of meta-stories might seem like a gimmick at first, but thirteen years on we've seen any number of video games experiment with a similar kind of structure, most with less success than eXistenZ. It isn't the first movie to explore the uncanny valley effect (Stepford Wives, etc.), but the stilted dialogue and surreal imagery of the "game world" in this movie capture that feeling more effectively than other films — and most games, too. It's very easy to laugh off uncanny valley silliness in most games, but the ones that truly make an impact *exploit* the inherent weirdness of the uncanny valley for narrative or thematic purposes. Cronenberg being Cronenberg, you know he's out to unnerve you, but it's not just about the creep factor here. I think he's also using the weirdness of devices like the tooth-gun scene to emphasize how stories can be game-like. As you describe, he's getting us to think about the internal logic of stories by messing with our expectations. The ending is brilliant in the way it adds yet another story layer on top of an already crowded stack and leaves us (and the main characters) with a lingering sense of doubt about what the "real" game/story was.

  • http://twitter.com/toddhooper @toddhooper

    Great article. eXistenZ is a great film from a great director.

    We always end up talking about eXistenZ at lunch, whenever anybody orders the special. :)

  • http://twitter.com/Triphibian @Triphibian

    I read the script before the movie came out. The eXistenZ in my head was way better than the one I saw on screen. :( I need to re-approach.

  • http://twitter.com/jaypullman @jaypullman

    First, this is a great idea for a column, and I don't think you could have picked a better subject for its debut.

    I like JPG's sentiment that Cronenberg's unnerving style lends itself to portraying the inherently strange disconnect between the "game world" and the real world. My absolute favorite example of this occurs early in the film when Ted "awakes" in-game to find himself working in a cannery assembly line, elbow-deep in mutant frog guts. Utterly confused in this environment, he just starts dissecting away, almost on instinct alone. His dish-gloved hands know what to do even if his mind is telling him, "Wtf am I doing here?" As he tries to get his bearings, he turns to a fellow "gamer" working on the line along side him. I don't remember the exact conversation (and unfortunately, I couldn't find a youtube clip) but after a few questions, Ted is fed a repeated line of stilted dialogue, revealing his fellow gamer's role in this scenario to be a NPC.

    That scene just hits the nail so hard on the head for me. There is a kind of symbiotic relationship going on between those sorts of jarringly postmodern videogame moments and the way Cronenberg seizes your attention with his sensual, uncomfortable, weird-as-fuck style. I like to think the relationship between the "player" and their "pod", which is literally plugged in to the nervous system of its user (and lends Cronenberg an opportunity for his signature creepy penetration scene), is kind of a manifestation of that collaboration. The two merge together almost as seamlessly as Cronenberg fuses his style with videogame fundamentals.

    But perhaps the most prolific scene is this gem right here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4L304A3KSh0
    I don't use my Kinect much but so help me, reenacting this scene never gets old.

    Great topic, Rowan. Looking forward to the next one!